<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Source Commons Blog - Latest Comments</title><link>http://sscblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://sscblog.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:25:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How Do You&amp;#8230; Find&amp;#8230; the People You Love?</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/07/how-do-you-find-the-people-you-love/#comment-498940370</link><description>&lt;p&gt;#2 &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amaison</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:25:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Creating &amp;#8220;Share This on Facebook/Twitter&amp;#8221; Links</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/03/creating-share-this-on-facebooktwitter-links/#comment-451360226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very well written post that explains exactly what I need.  Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carrie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:58:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Page vs. Group for Nonprofits</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/04/facebook-page-vs-group/#comment-430859152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I set up a Page for my organization and am now trying to set up a group under that Page but can't figure out how to do it.  It looks like that feature may no longer exist?  I can see how to do it on my personal page but not on the organization.....  Can you help?? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Katherine</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:11:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Page vs. Group for Nonprofits</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/04/facebook-page-vs-group/#comment-362518771</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The most important difference between Groups and Pages is that Pages can be indexed by Google so have a major SEO priority.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lollipop Local SEO</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:09:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Groups: Banished to the Archive</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/05/facebook-groups-banished-to-the-archive/#comment-361746659</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The main draw of Facebook for me was to make contact with friends from years ago, to share old photographs and reminisce.  I created a group for my old primary school and uploaded many school photos.  Other members also uploaded photos which is now a great place for people to connect with old school friends and share old photos and stories.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This group is now scheduled to be archived as Facebook deem that the page does not attract enough activity.I think Facebook are shooting themselves in the foot here, but there you go, when you get so big that all that concerns you is the demon dollar then there's only one way that things can go, down!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dyncoch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 04:52:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breakups are Hard: Departing Staff and Tech Security</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/10/breakups-are-hard-departing-staff-and-tech-security/#comment-340163425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We posted this article on our blog about how to deal with techies when they leave a while back -  &lt;a href="http://openconcept.ca/blog/mgifford/what_action_you_need_take_when_techie_leaves" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://openconcept.ca/blog/mgifford/what_action_you_need_take_when_techie_leaves"&gt;http://openconcept.ca/blog/...&lt;/a&gt; - We should probably refresh it and provide insights for managing social media &amp;amp; 3rd party services like Google Apps.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Gifford</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:12:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Page vs. Group for Nonprofits</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/04/facebook-page-vs-group/#comment-329015240</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the update on the custom URL, Steven! We need to go back and update this post. Facebook changes a lot of these settings on almost a weekly basis at this point :P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:15:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Page vs. Group for Nonprofits</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/04/facebook-page-vs-group/#comment-328006621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for this helpful post. FYI) Facebook recently eliminated the 25 like requirement for a custom URL for pages.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven L. Johnson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:30:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You a Twitter Spammer?</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/09/are-you-a-twitter-spammer/#comment-306112603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Related news of the day: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anonymous releasing Twitter Tool to hijack trending topics:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20103679-245/anonymous-group-releases-new-twitter-tool/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20103679-245/anonymous-group-releases-new-twitter-tool/"&gt;http://news.cnet.com/8301-2...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:12:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You a Twitter Spammer?</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/09/are-you-a-twitter-spammer/#comment-305359354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm with Peter. I got here via @Matt Garcia's tweet: &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/aspirationtech/statuses/111893627390799872" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/aspirationtech/statuses/111893627390799872"&gt;http://twitter.com/aspirati...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And called it a trick question because I've gotten great results using an @ message as advocacy, but I think we're talking about different things.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm sure the @ storm is a great  way to get at least a few people to open a URL. Which is why so many spammer's do it. I think that Twitter is a great place to get a conversation going, but if you can't generate a meaningful conversation, you're not actually improving over plain old email blasts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've gotten airlines to fix a botched ticket with a tweet addressed to them. I've weighed in on broken infrastructure or shoddy coverage of breaking news with @ replies, but they're authentic conversations. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amanda</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:26:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You a Twitter Spammer?</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/09/are-you-a-twitter-spammer/#comment-305236301</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely. @s have quickly become the new spam. Well, I guess "new" is relative... I wonder if there are many larger organizations or celebrities who respond to requests from strangers. I could see some being valuable and innocent while the canned, generic asks sent out ad naseum being the real meat-in-a-can.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:39:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You a Twitter Spammer?</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/09/are-you-a-twitter-spammer/#comment-304334353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like they were spamming to me. I regularly drop NPOs -- no matter how worthy their missions -- that DM or @ me with appeals and generic content.  I'm on Twitter to converse and share with my community, not to sift through the canned mail.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:34:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Do You&amp;#8230; Find&amp;#8230; the People You Love?</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/07/how-do-you-find-the-people-you-love/#comment-269067836</link><description>&lt;p&gt;#2!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lisa</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 20:25:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Groups: Banished to the Archive</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/05/facebook-groups-banished-to-the-archive/#comment-258997068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;After writing the above, all the members have reappeared in the old group format. Strange. There is no option to upgrade on the group page yet but everything is back as it was. It appears to have been un-archived! And it had been archived for about five days. So, it looks, Matt, that I'll wait and see. Thanks for the reply.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rods</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:01:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Groups: Banished to the Archive</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/05/facebook-groups-banished-to-the-archive/#comment-258909355</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ugh, Rod, that sucks! So sorry to hear that Facebook trampled all over the work you were doing. The worst part is that even if you knew it was coming Facebook makes it so hard to export anything in terms of group member information. Are you looking to rebuild on a different online platform?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:04:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Groups: Banished to the Archive</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/05/facebook-groups-banished-to-the-archive/#comment-258828946</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have/had three goups, of of which "Inline Street Skaters of Europe" had over 600 plus members with hundreds of personal and youtube videos added in the last two years. It was archived last week (the other two groups also). As the administrator I was not given the option of upgrading, which I would certainly have done. Instead: I logged on and all the worlwide members had disappeared. I was even unable to message everyone who had taken the trouble to join. Facebook just wiped their profiles away. I will not be putting my energy and enthusiasm into creating any other group like this again. - at least not on Facebook.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rods</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:00:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keeping Track of Your Dashboard Feeds with a Listening Matrix</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/06/keeping-track-of-your-dashboard-feeds-with-a-listening-matrix/#comment-237011043</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just discovered this site via a google search. Really glad I did! Lots of great info. And a terrific blog roll as well.&lt;br&gt;I am citing this site, and specifically this post in my newsletter going out in a few minutes. Thanks for the great info!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">heidimassey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:33:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Groups: Banished to the Archive</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/05/facebook-groups-banished-to-the-archive/#comment-206275424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was originally going to have a picture of the Soup Nazi angrily eating a bowl of Facebook Groups but the picture fell apart in my head... ;P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 14:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Groups: Banished to the Archive</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/05/facebook-groups-banished-to-the-archive/#comment-206225157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. The question is whether or not the Upgrade option would have eventually turned up if you hadn't have posted. Hmmm... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 12:58:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Groups: Banished to the Archive</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/05/facebook-groups-banished-to-the-archive/#comment-205603577</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I posted a status update on the group that was going to be archived due to lack of use, to warn members of what was likely to happen in the coming weeks. That seems to have been enough activity for the Facebook gods to revise their plans for our group, because when I checked today to see if we had been archived yet I found that we had been granted the option to upgrade. Upgrade completed. Two clicks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Plakun</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 21:32:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Groups: Banished to the Archive</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/05/facebook-groups-banished-to-the-archive/#comment-204614837</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am an admin of a closed group that is rarely used (but important to us members when we do). It's clear from what Facebook is telling us that we'll be archived -- we have not been given the option to upgrade. It's very difficult to parse the language facebook is using. "Archive" sounds like it's going somewhere inaccessible. But if you read carefully, it seems they're going to upgrade the group and eliminate the membership. They don't indicate some key details like whether it will be public or private, what will happen to the admins' relationship to the group. We're hoping that we'll be able to restore our private status and rebuild our membership. Anyone have a more clear idea of what they will allow "archived" groups to do?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Plakun</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 14:40:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Groups: Banished to the Archive</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/05/facebook-groups-banished-to-the-archive/#comment-204595304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No more soup for you. BAAAAAA that's funny. I didn't realize they were being so picky about it. Thanks for the post. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">karvetski</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 14:01:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Page vs. Group for Nonprofits</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/04/facebook-page-vs-group/#comment-198830608</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Debkl,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reaching out! You are right, you SHOULD be searchable online now that you have a page. I have not come across this problem yet, but there are a couple things to check to make sure you are search engine find-able.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the privacy settings of Facebook, check to make sure you have the box checked that enables your public search listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's the instructions from Facebook:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Click "Edit your settings" for the "Applications and Websites" section at the bottom of your main Privacy Settings page.- Scroll down to the Public search option and click "Edit Settings."- Check the box next to "Enable public search".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Please keep in mind that once you’ve changed your settings on Facebook.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sometimes there can be a delay from creating the page and to actually get you on the search engines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Otherwise, if you want to send your page URL along I can try to help troubleshoot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks and let me know how it's going.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyone else been able to overcome this problem?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Misty&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Misty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 18:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Page vs. Group for Nonprofits</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/04/facebook-page-vs-group/#comment-197302719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I created a Facebook Page for our nonprofit last week and it still is not coming up in a public search, which was the whole point.  There are no settings that I can find to change this.  Do you have any suggestions?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Debkl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 23:24:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Do You Manage Your Passwords?</title><link>https://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/2011/04/how-do-you-manage-your-passwords/#comment-186997654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Drew, using Roboform Everywhere seems like it would get addictive as in "I don't need to remember any password because I'm using this tool". Do you still keep your passwords easy to figure out in some way or do you rely on the tool to remember everything?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:54:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>